Thursday, October 18, 2012

Blogging Social Difference in L.A.: Week 3


The Grove
This week, I get a chance to visit the Grove with my friend Michelle. The Grove is basically an outdoor mall that just happens to be next to the Farmers Market. It is also known as one of the famous tourist spots in Los Angeles. When I leave the parking lot to the mall, I am already shocked by its artfully decoration. Not only do the place features a large center park with a fountain, some musical performances are also showed to the visitors. Famous brands and stores are also around in everywhere, like Banana Republic, Gap and Coach etc.... All these cast a glamour to the place, which makes me feel like I am inside the Disneyland. As a shopaholic, I can't wait to shop around in different stores, yet; most of the things in there are a little overpriced (perhaps because it's a tourist spot?:o) so I end up buying nothing. But still, me and my friend have a fantastic lunch in The Cheesecake Factory, which is always one of my favorite restaurants in the states.
Being located across the Fairfax Avenue and the 3rd Street, I am a little surprised to observe the huge differences between the Grove and its surrounding. If the Grove is like a fairyland like I have described in the above, its surrounding areas will get you a little disappointed because they do not show the same image as the Grove does. Indeed, when looking around these areas (e.g. Korea Town, Little Ethiopia etc), they give me another picture. Not only do they represent a large range of ethnic population, but these micro communities also seem practicing cultural agglomeration because of their proximity. In this case, I am kind of wondering how these micro communities actually interact with another in these areas. To make a better comparison, I would like to explore more about that when I visit places like Korea Town in the coming weeks. Another thing comes cross my mind is the social class difference. During my car trip, I pass through some streets in Beverley Hills and parts of the West Hollywood. Surprisingly, within only the few miles away between them, I discover a large disparity between the two places. Beverly Hills is definitely a rich area because houses are beautifully decorated with amazing scenery. Its housing price is also very high when comparing to houses in other L.A. regions. With the high living standard and spending, people who live there are more likely to be the middle and upper class. Nevertheless, when comes to West Hollywood, the glamorous scene in Beverly Hills no longer exists. Rather, working class are more likely to be dominated in this area and I even notice problems like poverty when I see two homeless man in the street.

Lastly, in the reading The Growth of the City, it mentions that our city is consists of a set of rings, ranging from the core "loop" to the "commuters' zone". Although the rings may not be directly applied to the entire L.A. area, we can still relate it to some extent. For example, we can consider the Grove as the "loop" (imagine it is a small town), the transition zone to be Korea Town, and the residential zone to be place like Beverly Hills, which "high-class apartment buildings or of exclusive "restricted" districts of single family dwellings." (The Blackwell City Reader, 2010) Though these may not be exactly correct, but it does help me to gain a better understand about the process for the growth of a city as well as how's these rings can be applied in the contemporary L.A. area.

2 comments:

  1. Hi! My name is Alexandra and I am in your Geog 151 class. Honestly, I selected you as the student I wanted to comment on because of your name. :) “King Wing” is seriously an awesome name! Then I noticed you wrote something about The Grove, in “Mid-West City,” L.A. I moved here in 2010 from Las Vegas to go to school at SMC; the Grove is one of the first places I visited when I finally got some free time! After seeing your selection, I knew I made the right choice of who to comment. I found some killer feather earrings, 2 pairs, and had to buy them! Overpriced... Probably, however I did not know when I would return or where else I could find such intricate pieces of work. I still have and wear AND LOVE them to this day!
    As I read your blog, I noticed some very great points and attention to detail about The Grove and its location. You mentioned its “artful decoration,” having your favorite restaurants and tons of overpriced great stores. I agree with you; it is extremely inviting and welcoming. You could lose your whole day by shopping, eating, enjoying the weather, riding the trolley, socializing, and so much more. I am pretty sure that IS its purpose. As I thought about The Grove and your blog, I thought more about what the development process was with respect to its purpose and reasons for its designated location. Of course, consumerism plays a huge role in all of this… the shoppers aka the money-spenders… which, as students, we know nothing about! I did some research, through Google, of course, and found information on Wikipedia (which might not be the most trusted website for everything but did give me some insight about its development). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grove_at_Farmers_Market
    They broke ground in 1999 and it officially opened in 2002. Slight controversy, initially, because of other shopping places in nearby locations, such as the Beverly Center; however, The Grove and its appeal has since then EXPLODED and become somewhat of a landmark.
    You mentioned many stores that The Grove offers; however, it also offers things to do for “non-spenders.” It has fountain shows, similar to the ones in Las Vegas at Bellagio, a trolley that takes you from the stores to the historic Farmer’s market, and plenty of outdoor seating and window shopping. Our most recent lecture we discussed, “Carceral Archipelago,” architect with the intent to restrict public access, casual walking and lingering. Most outdoor malls are seen as the opposite of this, because they have more to offer than just shopping or spending money, like a regular indoor mall. They are actually viewed as welcoming of those that linger. However, I do not consider The Grove as just any outdoor mall; therefore, I evaluate it slightly differently than the norm would. I think it plays into this idea of intentional “architectural” restrictions, while appearing on the exterior to appeal and invite all. Its high class amenities of a trolley, fountain shows, outdoor seating, and many other activities that do not cost are viewed as for “everyone.” Yet, “everyone” knows that wealthy people go to The Grove to shop, relax with a cup of coffee, watch movies… well, in other words, spend money and time enjoying themselves and the company of those like them. This is somewhat of an intimidating feeling, I would assume and have felt, for those that are not like “them.” Meaning, the ones that cannot afford to spend neither the time nor the money to enjoy what The Grove has to offer. This feeling, essentially forces some of the poorer population, if not most, to not even step foot into The Grove, or to spend a short amount of time there, if they do decide to go. Pretty interesting concept!

    ReplyDelete
  2. (it cut me off lol)

    I could go on and on about The Grove. However, you brought up another great point about its location and surrounding areas: “micro- communities” of various ethnic groups clumped together. I see them as the different “worlds” that do not interpenetrate, as stated by Robert E. Park. These surrounding areas are far different on the exterior than what The Grove offers to the eye; however, this idea of “coming together” is seen in both locations. The Grove even states on their site- the very first pop up picture- “Where L.A. Comes Together.” http://www.thegrovela.com/
    The same is true for the surrounding areas; agglomerations of people with common ethnicities and cultures. Although these two areas have vast differences, they share commonalities. That is why I find the question of what difference does difference make so intriguing. When the idea was first mentioned in class, I was clueless to the professor’s questioning and his point. However, the more I study the various cities and analyze all that I see, I realize how differences in one way or another do not make a difference. The difference is usually the immediate visual appearance (judgment or evaluation) but for the most part does not ring true once you evaluate and understand the underlying connections between two “exterior” differences.
    Well, King Wing, I truly enjoyed reading what you had to say. Your blog is very relatable, easy to understand, and makes the reader feel like they are there with you. You have great explanations and you did a wonderful job connecting it to lectures and readings. I just wanted to add some of my ideas to your already great piece. :) Good luck to you!

    ReplyDelete